Article

The Impact of Dietary Protein Intake of Laying Hens on Production Performance, Health and Nitrogen Excretion: A Review

Nuwan Chamara Chathuranga1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-4068, Jung Min Heo2,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1320
Author Information & Copyright
1Ph.D. Cadidate, Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
2Professor, Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
To whom correspondence should be addressed : jmheo@cnu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2025, Korean Society of Poultry Science. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Aug 25, 2025; Revised: Aug 25, 2025; Accepted: Aug 29, 2025

Published Online: Sep 30, 2025

ABSTRACT

This review discusses the effects of dietary protein intake on production performance, health, and nitrogen excretion in laying hens. The poultry industry faces the dual challenge of improving productivity while reducing environmental impact. Dietary protein plays a central role in egg production, egg quality, and overall bird performance. Traditionally, high crude protein (CP) levels were used to meet amino acid requirements and enhance output. However, excessive CP increases feed costs and nitrogen excretion, contributing to environmental concerns. The integration of non-bound amino acids into poultry diets has allowed for reduced CP levels without compromising performance. A well-balanced amino acid profile is essential for efficient nutrient use and minimizing waste. Various protein sources differ in their amino acid composition and digestibility, influencing their suitability in poultry feed. Selecting appropriate protein sources supports both bird health and sustainable production. This review highlights the importance of optimizing protein intake and amino acid balance to enhance performance and mitigate ecological impacts. Future research should explore alternative protein sources and refine amino acid supplementation to promote environmentally responsible poultry production.

Keywords: amino acid; dietary protein; ecological impact; protein sources; laying hens

INTRODUCTION

Dietary protein and energy are the primary nutrients that represent 90% of the cost of feedstuffs for livestock animals (Habib and Kasim, 2019). Among them, energy fuels the metabolic functions of animals whereas protein plays multiple critical roles including tissue growth and maintenance, production, immunity, and biochemical (enzymatic and hormonal) functions. Apart from this, it may influence carcass traits and abdominal fat levels in poultry, emphasizing the contribution of protein to energy metabolism in animals (NRC, 1994; Pesti, 2009). Therefore, protein and energy are the two primary considerations that feed formulators focus on during feed formulation for layer hens (Jeroch, 2011).

Ongoing controversies exist regarding using “dietary protein” and “CP” terms in feed formulations. The dietary protein content refers to the total proteins that are bioavailable to the animals while CP refers to the sum of total nitrogen content in the feed, including essential and non-essential amino acids and other nonprotein nitrogenous compounds (Pesti, 2009). Studies have shown that the protein and amino acid requirements of laying hens vary due to several factors, including the stage of egg production, body size, feed intake, and egg weight. These requirements are further influenced by variables such as breed, age, diet composition, and environmental conditions (Hurwitz and Bornstein, 1973).

CP is a crucial factor in poultry diets that may directly influence production performance. The (NRC, 1994) states that leghorn-type laying hens require 18.8%, 15.0%, or 12.5% CP, depending on daily feed intakes of 80, 100, or 120 grams per hen, respectively. For Hy-Line brown®, 16.5%, 17.80%, and 17.60% of CP requirement in laying hens in their pre-lay, peaking, and post-peaking stages respectively (Hy-Line, 2024). Therefore, diets must contain enough CP to provide essential amino acids as well as non-essential amino acids. Since laying hens rely on nutrients from their diet for producing eggs, the quality and composition of the feed are crucial. It is also particularly important given that feed expenses account for 60 to 70% of the total cost of egg production (Bell and Weaver, 2002; Oladokun and Johnson, 2012). Notably, it has become more crucial to balance feed costs and provide precise amounts of nutrients as needed throughout the laying cycle of hens to maximize profit margins (Shim et al., 2013). Hence, this review aims to provide further insight into the diverse sources of dietary protein, emphasizes the importance of optimizing protein intake for sustaining health and enhancing productivity, and explores the ecological advantages associated with efficient protein utilization.

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF PROTEIN-BASED DIETS IN POULTRY SCIENCE

In the early 20th century, the understanding of the role of protein in poultry diets began to develop, with significant progress in the chemistry of amino acids (Elwinger et al., 2016). By the 1940s, research expanded to include the study of the calorie-protein ratio and metabolizable energy in broiler diets, leading to the introduction of high-energy but protein-deficient diets (Wythe et al., 2023). The 1950s marked a turning point, with the introduction of “The Ideal Protein Concept” which could define the amino acid requirements corresponding to the maintenance and protein accretion of the birds, driving the formulation of diets tailored to specific nutrient compositions (Bryden et al., 2021). This method emerged during post—World War II research efforts aimed at refining the calorie-to-protein ratio and metabolizable energy values in broiler diets. The objective was to improve precision in estimating metabolizable energy by adjusting for zero nitrogen retention (Elwinger et al., 2016). At a similar period (in 1951), methionine was introduced as the first feed-grade crystalline amino acid. This advancement further transformed the poultry feed sector by partially replacing costly CP in poultry diets. In the modern era, innovations such as feed additives, including exogenous enzymes (i.e., introduced in the late 1980s to early 1990s), prebiotics, probiotics, and organic chelates, have enhanced the efficiency of nutrient utilization from poultry feed and hence growth performance and environmental sustainability (Ghasemi et al., 2020).

DIETARY PROTEIN SOURCES FOR LAYING HENS

Based on the origin of the ingredients, dietary protein sources can be primarily divided into two groups: animal-based and plant-based protein sources. Generally, plant-based protein sources are inferior to animal-based sources due to the lower digestibility and quality of proteins (Eagleson et al., 2018; Fanatico et al., 2018).

1. Animal-based Dietary Protein Sources
1) Meat and bone meal (MBM)

A by-product of animal slaughter, MBM is significant in nutrient cycling within agricultural production systems and ecological contexts while it is one of the most cost-effective animal protein sources available in commercial markets (Fanatico et al., 2018). Due to its higher protein and mineral content, MBM plays a crucial role in poultry nutrition. According to Parsons et al. (1997), MBM contains 48—56% of CP and it may greatly depend on processing techniques and raw material inputs. In terms of mineral content, it is an important source of calcium and phosphorus for laying hens (Dolz and De Blas, 1992; zkurt et al., 2004). Thus, the incorporation of dietary meat and bone meal (MBM) into the layer diet has been observed to enhance eggshell quality parameters (Sell and Jeffrey, 1996).

2) Blood meal

The blood meal is an animal rendering by-product that is produced at slaughterhouses. It contains 80—88% CP content and appropriate amino acid profiles. Hence, supplementation of blood meal with plant-based feedstuffs is a widely accepted approach in poultry feed formulations (Tyus et al., 2009). Among essential amino acids, methionine, cysteine, histidine, and leucine are present in beneficial amounts. Nonetheless, isoleucine and glycine contents are lower compared to meat and bone meal and fish meal. Because of this reason, isoleucine is the first limiting amino acid in blood meals (NRC, 1994; Khawaja et al., 2007). Odunsi (2003) and Onwudike (1981) found that blood meal alone cannot enhance the laying performance of hens without the addition of another protein source, such as fish meal. Inclusion rates of blood meals can vary according to the laying stage, strains, and the quality of blood meal (i.e., species and processing techniques used).

3) Fish meal

Fishmeal derives from various sources, including whole fish such as menhaden, sardines, carp, and anchovies, and fish processing waste including offal and trimmings (Fanatico et al., 2018). It contains high-quality proteins, energy, minerals (i.e., calcium and phosphorus), omega-3 fatty acids, and vitamins that are appropriate for poultry nutrition. Fishmeal protein exhibits a high biological value in animal diets. It is particularly abundant in essential amino acids, such as lysine and sulfur-containing amino acids (Karimi, 2006). The quality of fishmeal and its CP content can vary between 57% and 77%, depending on the species of fish and the processing methods used (Miles and Jacob, 1999). Fish meal production has also become an effective control measure for invasive fish species, such as Asian carp, in native aquatic ecosystems (Fanatico et al., 2018). Despite its nutritional benefits, its 10—12% fish oil content can cause a fishy odor, potential rancidity, and handling difficulties, affecting its use in poultry farming (Sellers, 2002). Excessive fish meals in diets can also lead to gizzard erosion and off-flavor transmission into eggs and meat (NRC, 1994). Additionally, high cost and limited availability can further constrain its use in feed formulations (Donkoh et al., 2001).

2. Plant-Based Protein Sources

Literature suggests that animal protein sources may lead to quality concerns and pathogenic microbial (i.e., Salmonella) transmission through diets. Thus, the inclusion of good quality animal-based protein sources with plant-based sources is a common practice in poultry feeding.

1) Soybean meal (SBM)

The soybean (Glycine max) can be fed to poultry either whole or as soybean meal, with the seed primarily consisting of 90% cotyledon and 8% hull. The cotyledon is rich in proteins and fats, which is a crucial input for the oil industry. After extracting oil, the residual material primarily serves as a high-protein feed for poultry. There are two main methods for oil extraction: expeller pressing and solvent extraction. Among these, soybean meals obtained through solvent extraction are particularly popular and widely used in poultry feed (Dourado et al., 2011; Fig. 1).

kjps-52-3-151-g1
Fig. 1. Global soybean production from 2013 to 2023. Source: FAO (2024).
Download Original Figure

This oilseed is globally cultivated and plays a significant role in both human and animal nutrition due to its versatile applications. During the feed formulations for poultry, 44 and 49% of the CP of SBM are utilized as the major two standardized. SBM is a rich source of lysine (6.2 g/16 gN), with a low prevalence of methionine and cysteine content (2.9 g/16 gN) (Banaszkiewicz, 2011; Toomer et al., 2024).

Despite its excellent amino acid profiles and high-protein content, soybeans also contain antinutritional factors such as trypsin inhibitors, lectins (hemagglutinins), phytates, tannins, oxalates, and non-starch polysaccharides (Di et al., 2024). Processing techniques are involved in particular antinutritional factors (trypsin inhibitors) inactivation and are mostly employed by meticulously controlled thermal processing techniques (NRC, 1994). Additionally, soybean hull is an appropriate feed ingredient that can replace wheat bran (weight basis) without compromising poultry performance. Nevertheless, inclusion rates are limited due to its higher fibrous content (Dourado et al., 2011). Esonu et al. (2005) conducted a study on laying hens and found that feed conversion efficiencies were higher when their diets were supplemented with up to 20% soybean hulls and 30% cellulolytic enzymes.

2) Peanut meal

Efforts to replace traditional SBM in poultry diets aim to enhance cost-effectiveness. Among alternative protein sources, peanut meals (PNM) are significantly used in poultry feed, improving growth performance and egg production in laying hens. Generally, solvent-extracted meals are considered as the preferable type for laying hens (Batal et al., 2005). It contains 2,273—3,009 kcal/kg of nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable (TMEn), 40.1—50.9% of CP, 0.68—5.97% of crude fat, and 5.77—12.6% of crude fiber content (Xia et al., 2022). On a 90% dry matter basis, the average mineral concentrations in peanut meals were measured as follows: calcium at 0.08%, phosphorus at 0.57%, sodium at 0.01%, and potassium at 1.22% (Batal et al., 2005). Nevertheless, PNM is notably low in threonine, with lysine being the first limiting amino acid whereas aflatoxin is a critical concern that can directly affect impairing production performance in chickens (Costa et al., 2001).

3) Sunflower meal

Sunflower (Helianthus annus) meal (SFM), a by-product of sunflower seed oil extraction, serves as an alternative protein source for broilers, layers, and waterfowl (Senkoylu and Dale, 1999). It contains substantial amounts of proteins, fiber, and minerals (Ca and P), as well as B-complex vitamins. In addition, it contains a considerable amount of α-tocopherols (608 mg/Kg seed) and antioxidants which are important to improve health of laying hens. Notably, SFM can effectively replace SBM in poultry diets owing to its lower antinutritional content. Nevertheless, its lower lysine and methionine content limits its usage as a poultry feed (Saleh et al., 2021). Baghban-Kanani et al. (2018) conducted a study with SFM inclusion up to 20%, supplemented with multi-complex enzymes for Hy-Line (39 weeks) and White Leghorn (36 weeks) hens. Their findings suggest that approximately 6% of SBM can be substituted with SFM without adversely affecting egg production or quality traits. According to the, Rao et al. (2006) the inclusion of SFM in broiler diets is limited to a maximum of 15% due to its high fiber content, which is poorly digested by poultry and may compromise nutrient utilization.

4) Cottonseed meal

Cottonseed (CSM) meal is a residual product of cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum) oil manufacturing and a possible protein source (33—41 %) for poultry (Nagalakshmi et al., 2007). Nevertheless, its poor protein quality and high fibrous nature have constrained its usage in poultry diets. Conversely, free gossypol and cyclopropenoid fatty acids (CPFA) have further limited their usage by acting as antinutritional factors (ANFs) for them (Wang et al., 2020). Gossypol can inhibit pepsin and trypsin activity and bind with lysine in poultry diets and subsequently may reduce protein digestibility. Yolk molting is a one of internal quality defects occurring due to free gossypol in laying hen diets. On the other hand, CPFA may lead to a pinkish discoloration of the albumen. Feeding CSM at levels over 100 mg/kg can lower egg production, depending on the strain, age, and total protein content in the diet. However, this might be overcome by supplementing iron and lysine to layer diets (Nagalakshmi et al., 2007). Mandal et al. (2024) stated that high fibrous nature and the free gossypol presence of CSM may deleteriously affect feed intake and the body weight of the broiler chickens. For instance, incorporating 5—10% of CSM into broiler diets may significantly increase the average daily feed intake as well as the average daily gain of the broilers. Notably, this fact may work on the layer pullet development as well.

3. Non-Bound Amino Acid Supplementation

The amino acid requirements of poultry should be proportional to the CP and metabolizable energy (ME) content of the feed. In parallel, maintaining a proper balance between essential and non-essential amino acids is also vital to sustaining production performance in poultry. To promote optimal protein utilization and minimize dependence on costly CP sources, a range of feed-grade amino acids are now commercially synthesized for poultry diets. These include essential amino acids such as DL-methionine, L-lysine, L-threonine, L-tryptophan, L-arginine, L-valine, and L-isoleucine (Vieira et al., 2016), along with non-essential amino acids alanine, asparagine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glutamine, glycine, proline, serine, and tyrosine which are available at industrial scale for integration into formulated feeds (Maia et al., 2024). Pesti (2009) noted that poultry feed without synthetic amino acids requires supplementation at 71% of SBM and 14% of corn to meet the minimum essential amino acid requirements. This formulation also needed a minimum of 35.6% CP content. However, the inclusion of even minute concentrations of synthetic amino acids could significantly reduce these requirements. Hence, Pesti (2009) concluded that SBM incorporation can be decreased to 29.29% with the addition of 0.27% DL-Methionine, 0.07% L-Threonine, and 0.09% L-Lysine. This proves that non-bound amino acids have a substantial impact on poultry production, exerting effect on feed ingredient replacement and cost reduction.

4. Novel Protein Sources

Higher populations growth negatively affects SBM (primary protein source) usage in poultry feed by enhancing higher demand in human consumption (Di et al., 2024). To confront this competition, numerous protein sources have been introduced as alternatives. Among them, novel protein sources such as insect meals and single cell proteins have gained attention as sustainable alternatives for laying hens. These innovative protein sources offer high nutritional value while potentially reducing the environmental impact of poultry production (Sajid et al., 2023).

1) Insect meal

Insects, such as black soldier fly larvae (Patterson et al., 2021), mealworms (Sedgh et al., 2021; Stastnik et al., 2021), and crickets (Shah and Wanapat, 2021), are rich in EAAs, fats, and micronutrients. Their proteins possess high digestibility and well-balanced amino acid profiles, compared to fish meal and meat and bone meal, positioning them as a promising alternative to conventional protein sources such as soybean meal (Sajid et al., 2023; Slimen et al., 2023). Studies show that incorporating insect protein into layer diets can maintain or even improve egg production, egg quality (e.g., shell strength, yolk color), and the overall health of hens (Slimen et al., 2023). Insects also have the added benefit of being produced using organic waste, reducing the environmental footprint of feed production. Notably, insect farming requires less land and water compared to traditional protein sources, emphasizing its efficiency in usage at global levels (Elahi et al., 2022).

2) Single cell proteins (SCP)

Recently, extensive research has explored the use of SCP as a feed ingredient in poultry diets, offering a sustainable solution to the high cost of protein supplements and the challenges of environmental pollution (Patthawaro and Saejung, 2019; Raziq et al., 2020). They are highly value-added, protein-rich sources synthesized through microbial biomass extraction. Algae (i.e., Chlorella, Spirulina), bacteria (i.e., Cyanobacteria, Methylococcus), and fungi (i.e., Saccharomyces cerevisiae) are under this category.

For instance, algae is a novel protein source for laying hens (Panaite et al., 2023; Madacussengua et al., 2024) and is not only rich in protein but also contains beneficial bioactive compounds such as omega-3 fatty acids, carotenoids, and antioxidants. These compounds have the potential to enhance egg quality, by improving yolk color and healthy fatty acid content in eggs (Hasan et al., 2018; Salahuddin et al., 2024). Algae can be produced on non-arable land, contributing to more sustainable feeding practices. Therefore, these sources serve as valuable ingredients in the poultry feed industry (Hombegowda et al., 2021).

Notably, the high growth rates of microorganisms and the ability for continuous harvest make SCP production advantageous, particularly when utilizing low-cost raw materials (Ritala et al., 2017). For instance, poultry waste or litter can serve as substrates for SCP-producing microorganisms, providing a potential solution to the issue of poultry waste. Jalasutram et al. (2013) conducted a study using Candida utilis derived from digested and undigested poultry litter. The study revealed that undigested poultry litter can effectively be used as a source of raw materials for SCP production(Table 1).

Table 1. Comparative nutritional profiles of common protein sources used in laying hen diets
Protein source CP (%) Limiting amino acids Notable nutrients Limitations
Meat and bone meal 48–56 None Ca & P Quality variability, potential pathogen transmission risk
Blood meal 80–88 Isoleucine Methionine & leucine Low glycine limitation in incorporations
Fish meal 57–77 None Omega-3, lysine High cost; off-flavor in eggs
Soybean meal 44–49 Methionine, cysteine Lysine High demand (food vs. feed), prevalence of antinutritional factors
Peanut meal 40–51 Lysine, threonine Crude fiber, fat Aflatoxin contamination risk
Sunflower meal 28–41 Lysine, methionine Fiber, antioxidants High fiber content
Cottonseed meal 33–41 lysine Crude fiber Gossypol & CPFA toxicity
Download Excel Table
3) Role of essential amino acids in layer performance optimization

Amino acids are structural and functional units of the proteins, and they are categorized into two primary groups based on their ability to be synthesized within the animal body, named essential and nonessential amino acids (Debnath et al., 2019). Amino acid imbalances, antagonism, and toxicity can adversely affect animals when they are not provided at optimal levels in feed (NRC, 1994). Importantly, EAAs play a crucial role in optimizing the performance of laying hens by supporting egg production, growth, and overall health. Among EAA, methionine and lysine are particularly important. The other amino acids such as threonine, tryptophan, and arginine also contribute significantly to various physiological processes in layers (Macelline et al., 2021; Da et al., 2022).

4) Methionine

Methionine is the most prominent sulfur-containing amino acid in poultry nutrition. It is considered as the primary limiting amino acid in corn-soybean-based diets due to its limited availability in plant-based protein sources (Macelline et al., 2021). Methionine plays multiple critical roles in poultry nutrition. It functions as an essential amino acid in protein and polyamine synthesis, serves as a sulfur donor, and acts as a precursor for important metabolic intermediates such as carnitine and cysteine. For instance, two methionine molecules supply S atoms to synthesize cysteine by oxidizing sulfhydryl groups. Moreover, methionine serves as a methyl group donor required for the biosynthesis of the coenzyme S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which plays a pivotal role in methylation reactions and metabolic regulations (NRC, 1994; Babazadeh and Simab, 2022).

Methionine is also vital for egg production performance, egg quality, and feather maintenance in laying hens (Macelline et al., 2021). For instance, a review by Elnesr et al. (2024) noted which methionine mineral chelates, such as Zn-Met, Mn-Met, and Cu-Met, can improve both internal and external quality of eggs. Furthermore, methionine contributes to enhancing egg size by improving overall protein utilization and adequate methionine levels can also help alleviate fatty liver disease, heat stress and optimize feed efficiency in layer hens (Ma et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2023). In parallel, studies indicate that low-protein diets (14—16%) supplemented adequately with methionine enhance productive performance than high-protein diets (18%) at constant methionine-to-protein ratios (Babazadesh and Simab, 2022).

5) Lysine

Lysine is often considered the second limiting amino acid in corn and soybean meal-based diets. When applying the ideal protein concept to poultry feed formulation, lysine is designated as the reference amino acid due to its distinctive attributes most notably its fundamental role in protein synthesis and its well-defined, consistent requirement across poultry species. Adequate supplementation is essential as it involves egg protein synthesis (Silva et al., 2015; Macelline et al., 2021). Lysine deficiencies may observe egg mass reduction, poor feed conversion, and impaired growth (Onimisi et al., 2012; Kakhki et al., 2016). According to the Hy-Line (2024), lysine requirement of Hy-Line brown layers at their peak should be 0.91% and gradually decrease with age up to 0.58% (at 100 weeks of age). Nevertheless, these requirements can be further differentiated with strains and health conditions of them.

6) Threonine

Threonine is the third limiting amino acid, vital for protein synthesis in the gut lining and immune tissues (barrier function), which directly support gut health and digestion. This, in turn, ensures efficient nutrient absorption and overall bird performance (Hossaninejad et al., 2021). The National Research Council (1994) recommended 0.47% of threonine supplement for the brown egg-laying hens. However, modern management guides (Hy-Line, 2024) have suggested 0.65—0.58% of threonine uptake for better performance in Hy-Line brown hens.

Notably, diet threonine levels are directly influenced by the CP levels provided. It is proved that threonine at 14% of CP diets becomes a limiting amino acid in corn soybean-based diets. Moreover, its deficiencies may reduce egg production and impaired immune function, making hens more susceptible to diseases (Macelline et al., 2021). Furthermore, Azzam et al. (2019) noted a significant decrease in total cholesterol levels at 0.66% L-threonine supplementation for Lohmann Brown hens at 28 weeks of age as well as the egg production rates(Table 2).

Table 2. Key functions, deficiency effects and recommended inclusion levels of essential amino acids in laying hens
Amino acid Main function in hens Deficiency effects Recommended inclusion (%) References
Methionine Egg production, liver protection, feathering Reduced egg size, fatty liver, poor feathers 0.3–0.4 Babazadesh and Simab (2022), Macelline et al. (2021)
Lysine Egg mass synthesis, muscle growth Poor growth, small eggs, weak feathers 0.6–0.9 Silva et al. (2015), Kim et al. (2020)
Threonine Gut health, immune system support Poor digestion, lowered immunity 0.58–0.65 Azzam et al. (2019), Hossaninejad et al. (2021)
Tryptophan Stress management, behavior modulation Aggression, stress sensitivity ~0.18–0.201 Macelline et al. (2021), Sarsour et al. (2021)
Arginine Eggshell strength, immune cell development Poor shell quality, weak immune function ~1.0–1.21 Yuan et al. (2016), Macelline et al. (2021)

1 Estimated values.

Download Excel Table
7) Protein quality vs. protein quantity implications for laying hens

Protein quality and quantity are critical factors in the nutrition of laying hens, affecting egg production, growth, and health (Panda et al., 2012; Kim and Kang, 2022). Protein quantity refers to the total amount of dietary protein in diets, while protein quality is defined by containing well-balanced amino acid profiles and their higher digestibility (Adhikari et al., 2022). Insufficient dietary protein intake may lead to deficiencies in essential amino acids (EAAs), such as methionine, lysine, and threonine that can negatively affect egg production and quality, feather growth and health of animals. Conversely, excessive supplementations may impair nutrient utilization due to the deamination of surplus amino acids, leading to elevated ammonia production and increased energy expenditure for its detoxification. Subsequently, this might detrimentally impact the environment.

Increasing the total protein intake may not be effective if the quality of the protein source is inadequate (Alagawany et al., 2016). Sakomura et al. (2019) stated that improving protein quality may enhance egg production and quality, even if the overall protein intake remains constant. High-quality proteins, rich in essential amino acids, support better feed efficiency and reduce nitrogen waste (by balancing amino acids), leading to more sustainable production (Attia et al., 2020). Therefore, balancing both protein quality and quantity is essential for maximizing laying hens’ productivity and health, while also minimizing feed costs and environmental impact(Table 3).

Table 3. Suggested CP requirements for laying hens by production stage
Production stage CP (%) Purpose Reference
Pre-lay (15–18 weeks) 16.0–17.5 Supporting pullet growth and reproductive development Hy-Line (2024)
Peak production (20–30 weeks) 17.5–18.5 Maximize egg mass and quality NRC (1994), Hy-Line (2024)
Mid-lay (30–60 weeks) 16.0–17.0 Maintain production and health Hy-Line (2024)
Late lay (60+ weeks) 15.0–16.0 Sustain output with lower metabolic strain Kleyn and Ciacciariello (2023)
Download Excel Table
8) Comparative studies on high vs. low protein diets in laying performance

Comparative studies on high vs. low protein diets in laying hens have shown significant impacts on laying hens’ performance, health, and metabolic processes. For instance, low-protein diets, especially when combined with high energy levels, can lead to lipid metabolism disorders in late-phase laying hens, causing fat accumulation in the liver and negatively affecting egg quality and overall health (Han et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2024). Particularly, high-energy, low-protein diets can induce lipid peroxidation and inflammatory responses in both the liver and abdominal adipose tissue, suggesting a reciprocal regulation between these tissues during fatty liver development (Rozenboim et al., 2016; Du et al., 2024). Torki et al. (2015) compared different protein levels (10.5% to 16.5% CP) under high-temperature conditions and showed that diets with 12.0% to 15.0% CP maintained similar egg production and quality as the control diet (16.5% CP). However, a diet with 10.5% CP significantly decreased egg production and egg mass.

Moreover, Jahan et al. (2024) demonstrated that hens fed a low-protein diet in the morning and a high-protein diet in the afternoon showed no significant differences in egg production and size compared to hens fed a high-protein diet throughout the day. According to Hu et al. (2024), low-protein diets can also alter the caecal microbiome, affecting the metabolism of essential vitamins such as riboflavin (i.e., vitamin B2) and pantetheine (i.e., vitamin B5 derivative), which may contribute to lipid metabolism disorders and fat accumulation in the liver. These studies suggest that while low-protein diets can be beneficial in certain contexts, they must be carefully balanced with energy levels and supplemented with essential nutrients to avoid negative impacts on laying hens’ health and performance(Table 4).

Table 4. Comparative effects of high vs. low protein diets on laying hens
Parameter High protein diet Low protein diet
Egg production Often increased or sustained Sustain with well-balanced amino acid supplementation
Egg quality Improved albumen, yolk protein Poor shell strength, smaller eggs (without amino acid balancing)
Health & longevity Risk of metabolic overload Maintained with a balanced amino acid profile
Laying persistency Moderate to higher Maintained
Feed cost Higher Lower
Nitrogen excretion Elevated Further reduced with synthetic amino acid inclusion
Environmental impact Greater (ammonia, eutrophication) Lower with proper formulation
Download Excel Table
9) Impact of dietary protein on longevity and health of laying hens

Genetically improved or selected (by laying long clutches) layers have a production lifespan of 100≤weeks in the modern era. These “long-life layers” are predicted to lay more than 500 eggs in a particular period. The primary determinants of the economic lifespan of the layers are the progressive decline in egg production and deterioration of quality, unless they die (Kleyn and Ciacciariello, 2023). Dietary protein is crucial in determining the longevity and overall health of hens. Adequate protein intake is essential for maintaining egg production and quality, feather condition, immunity functions, and muscle maintenance of them (Shim et al., 2013). Hence, dietary protein deficiencies may deteriorate the characteristics such as egg quality traits (i.e., low-quality albumen and shell), metabolic activities, muscle nutrition, disease resistance, and feather quality (i.e., low growth and quality) (Sun et al., 2022).

Conversely, excessive protein in the diet can strain the liver and kidneys, potentially leading to metabolic disorders (Bunchasak et al., 2005) and increasing the abdominal fat content of the hens (Pesti, 2009). Balancing CP levels with other nutrients, such as amino acids, ensures that hens receive the building blocks necessary for egg production, tissue repair, immune function, and optimal physiological health throughout their laying cycle (Keshavarz and Austic, 2004). A well-formulated diet with the appropriate protein content contributes to prolonged productivity, better resistance to diseases, and overall improved health for hens (Shim et al., 2013).

10) Impact of dietary protein on immune function under stress conditions

Dietary protein can regulate the oxidative stress response in laying hens. Stress conditions often lead to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage cellular components such as proteins, DNA, and lipids (He et al., 2018; Oke et al., 2024). Sufficient dietary protein, particularly those rich in sulfur-containing amino acids such as methionine and cysteine, plays a multifaceted role in the health of laying hens. Firstly, they compensate for damaged proteins, aiding tissue repair and maintenance. Secondly, these proteins enhance the antioxidant capacity of hens by supporting the synthesis of glutathione, a major intracellular antioxidant. By bolstering glutathione production, these proteins effectively mitigate oxidative stress, contributing to overall hen well-being and potentially improving egg quality (Macelline et al., 2021). Besides, proteins are essential for producing antibodies, mucus, and immune cells (primary factors of the immune system). Thus, optimizing dietary protein levels supports immune function and helps mitigate the adverse effects of oxidative stress, contributing to better overall health and productivity in poultry (Oke et al., 2024).

11) Impact of dietary protein on growth performance and body composition

The body weight difference of the laying hens at 20 weeks persists throughout the 72 weeks of age and it has a close relation with the size and weight of the eggs (Bish et al., 1985). Dietary protein significantly influences growth and body composition in laying hens by providing the essential amino acids required for tissue development, feather growth, and protein synthesis in egg production (Shim et al., 2013). Adequate protein intake supports muscle development and overall body mass, particularly during the pullet stage when hens are still growing. At this stage, dissimilar CP recommendations could be observed depending on the breed or strain of the hens.

Dietary protein expends for production and maintenance of birds, and hence it is associated with lean tissue development and optimal body composition determination (Summers and Leeson, 1994; Srilatha et al., 2018). Insufficient protein in the diet can result in stunted growth, reduced muscle mass, and poor feather quality, which may affect the overall weight loss of the hens (Chalova et al., 2016). Thus, dietary protein level optimization is critical for achieving optimal growth rates and maintaining a healthy body composition in layer hens, contributing to their overall performance.

12) Impact of dietary protein intake on laying performance

Dietary protein intake determines egg production rates and its consistency in laying hens. Eggs contain significant amounts of protein, particularly in the egg white which consists largely of albumen (Mine, 2008). Adequate dietary protein provides the necessary amino acids which are important in the synthesis of egg components including, yolk, albumen, and the shell membranes (Macelline et al., 2021). Insufficient protein intake compromises a hen’s ability to produce eggs at peak levels and its quality (Summers and Leeson, 1994).

The quantity and quality of protein in a hen’s diet directly influence both the rate of egg production and the quality of the eggs (Kim and Kang, 2022). Essential amino acids, particularly methionine, lysine, and threonine, are critical for maintaining high production rates (Macelline et al., 2021). Hens fed diets with adequate protein lay more eggs and maintain better overall health, with improved muscle maintenance and body condition, allowing for consistent production (Summers and Leeson, 1994). Protein deficiencies can lead to reduced egg size, weaker shells, and erratic laying patterns, highlighting the importance of protein in sustaining both egg quantity and quality (Macelline et al., 2021). Additionally, protein requirements may vary with the hen’s laying phase, with peak protein demand occurring around 25—30 weeks of age (Thayer et al., 1974).

13) Impact of dietary protein intake on egg quality

Dietary protein levels play a crucial role in determining egg size, yolk composition, and, to a lesser extent of shell quality in chickens. Higher CP levels generally result in larger eggs due to the provision of essential building blocks for egg white and overall egg formation (Kowalska et al., 2021). Hens-fed diets with sufficient or increased protein tend to produce larger eggs with a higher proportion of albumen. In contrast, low protein levels can lead to smaller eggs, as the hens lack the necessary amino acids at optimal balance for proper egg development (Leeson, 1989; Pesti, 1991). While shell quality is more directly influenced by nutrients such as calcium and vitamin D, insufficient protein can indirectly lead to poorer shell quality by affecting the hen’s overall health and nutrient absorption (Shim et al., 2013; Stefanello et al., 2014). However, exceeding requirements can also reduce eggshell quality by increasing egg size and thereby shell area.

Dietary protein also impacts yolk composition, with higher protein levels increasing yolk size and enhancing its protein content (Prochaska et al., 1996; Shim et al., 2013). Adequate protein intake ensures a more nutritionally balanced yolk, whereas a protein-deficient diet may result in smaller, less nutritious yolks. While protein levels do not have a direct negative effect on shell quality, they influence overall egg quality by supporting the hen’s ability to metabolize and utilize other essential nutrients effectively (Gunawardana et al., 2008). Therefore, maintaining an appropriate balance of dietary protein, along with other key nutrients, is essential for optimizing egg size, shell strength, and yolk nutritional value.

The balance of amino acids is also critical for maintaining the reproductive health of hens, affecting processes such as follicle development and vitellogenin production in the liver, which is necessary for yolk formation (Gunawardana et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2021). Factors including hen’s age, breed, and environmental stress influence their amino acid requirements. High-producing breeds, need carefully balanced diets to ensure consistent egg production and quality. Adequate amino acid intake ensures that hens can lay healthy eggs while maintaining their overall well-being (Macelline et al., 2021).

14) Impact of dietary protein intake on metabolic pathways

Protein intake in laying hens significantly affects amino acid metabolism, protein synthesis, and energy pathways (Kidd et al., 2021). The urea cycle becomes more active with higher protein intake to manage excess nitrogen, while low protein intake may lead to reduced amino acid availability, affecting overall production and growth rates (Macelline et al., 2021). In particular, amino acids derived from protein content such as cysteine, glutamine, arginine, leucine, proline and tryptophan are involved in metabolic pathways of hens (Qaid and Al-Garadi, 2021). For instance, mTOR and IGF signaling play a major role as key regulatory pathways for protein synthesis and growth regulation corresponding to protein availability within the animal body (Xu and Velleman, 2023).

Energy metabolism is also influenced by protein levels, with higher intake supporting enhanced energy production through amino acid oxidation, while lower intake shifts metabolism toward gluconeogenesis, converting amino acids into glucose to maintain energy balance (Chwalibog, 1985). Protein intake can also modulate fat metabolism, affecting the balance between fat deposition and utilization, which impacts both energy storage and reproductive health (Hu et al., 2024).

In addition, protein influences reproductive processes, bone health, and immune function. Sufficient protein supports yolk protein deposition, eggshell formation, and overall reproductive performance, while also enhancing immune responses through antioxidant defense mechanisms (Alagawany et al., 2016). Nevertheless, excessive protein may lead to inefficiencies due to increased nitrogen waste, so optimal protein intake is key for balancing these metabolic pathways for egg production and hen health (Ji et al., 2014).

15) Impact of dietary protein on environmental sustainability

In poultry, dietary proteins are broken down into amino acids, which are absorbed in the small intestine and transported to various tissues where they are used for the synthesis of muscle proteins, enzymes, and other nitrogenous compounds (Forbes and Shariatmadari, 1994). Any excess amino acids that are not used for protein synthesis undergo deamination, where the amino group is removed. This results in the formation of ammonia, which is then converted to less toxic forms such as uric acid through the uricotelic pathways, a key adaptation in birds to conserve water and manage nitrogen waste (Wright, 1995; Stern and Mozdziak, 2019). Uric acid is secreted via the kidneys and eliminated as a component of poultry excrements (Such et al., 2021). The efficiency of protein metabolism in poultry is influenced by factors such as the quality and composition of dietary proteins, the balance of essential amino acids, and the age and physiological state of the birds (Shim et al., 2013).

High levels of nitrogen excretion are associated with inefficient protein utilization and lead to increased ammonia emissions, contributing to poor air quality and potential respiratory issues in rearing environment (Giannakis et al., 2019; Such et al., 2021). Furthermore, nitrogen-rich manure can have detrimental environmental effects, such as water contamination through nitrate leaching and eutrophication of aquatic systems (Rayne and Aula, 2020). This eutrophication depletes oxygen levels when they decompose, creating “dead zones” that are unable to support aquatic life, disrupting biodiversity and fisheries (Bailey et al., 2020). Additionally, the toxins produced by some algae can pose risks to human health, wildlife, and livestock, making nitrogen runoff a major environmental concern (Pitois et al., 2001).

On land, excess nitrogen can degrade soil quality and contribute to air pollution. When poultry manure is over-applied, it may lead to soil acidification, harming plant growth and reducing soil fertility. The imbalance also disrupts microbial communities vital to maintaining healthy soils (Rayne and Aula, 2020). In the atmosphere, ammonia from manure contributes to air pollution and forms harmful particulate matter, while nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas, accelerates climate change. This disruption extends to insects, birds, and other wildlife that depend on these ecosystems for survival (Tamm, 2012; Debaba et al., 2024). These emissions have serious public health implications, including respiratory problems for people living near poultry farms (Casey et al., 2006). In addition to harming ecosystems, nitrogen pollution also poses public health risks, such as nitrate contamination of drinking water, which can cause methemoglobinemia (blue baby syndrome) in infants (Ward et al., 2018). As such, optimizing dietary protein levels and improving the balance of amino acids can enhance nitrogen utilization, reduce waste excretion, and minimize the environmental risk from poultry farms.

SUMMARY

Dietary protein levels directly affect egg production and the growth performance of laying hens. Hence, precise supplementation is essential to strike a balance between productivity, bird health, and environmental sustainability. These supplementations must also remain economically viable. This review highlights the various protein sources available for laying hens, their amino acid profiles, and the role of dietary protein in influencing growth performance, egg production, and egg quality. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of minimizing nitrogen excretion from poultry to support environmental sustainability. The “ideal amino acid balance” concept is one of the most effective approaches to achieving these goals, as it addresses the balance of protein and key nutrients in the diet. However, this concept often falls short in balancing essential and non-essential amino acids. Selecting appropriate protein sources is critical to overcoming this limitation. Novel protein sources such as single-cell proteins and insect meals show significant potential for enhancing sustainability in poultry nutrition. Future strategies should focus on innovative, highly bioavailable protein sources.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This review was supported by the Rural Development Administration of the Republic of Korea (project number: RS-2022-RD010370).

REFERENCES

1.

Adhikari S, Schop M, de Boer IJ, Huppertz T 2022 Protein quality in perspective: a review of protein quality metrics and their applications. Nutrition 14(5):947.

2.

Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME, Farag MR, Tiwari R, Sachan S, Karthik K, Dhama K 2016 Positive and negative impacts of dietary protein levels in laying hens. Asian J Anim Sci 10(2):165-174.

3.

Attia YA, Bovera F, Wang J, Al-Harthi MA, Kim WK 2020 Multiple amino acid supplementations to low-protein diets: effect on performance, carcass yield, meat quality and nitrogen excretion of finishing broilers under hot climate conditions. Animals 10(6):973.

4.

Azzam MM, Alhotan R, Al-Abdullatif A, Al-Mufarrej S, Mabkhot M, Alhidary IA, Zheng C 2019 Threonine requirements in dietary low crude protein for laying hens under high-temperature environmental climate. Animals 9(9):586.

5.

Babazadeh D, Simab PA 2022 Methionine in poultry nutrition: a review. J World’s Poult Sci 1(1):1-11.

6.

Baghban-Kanani P, Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad B, Azimi-Youvalari S, Seidavi A, Ayaşan T, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V 2018 Effect of different levels of sunflower meal and multi-enzyme complex on performance, biochemical parameters and antioxidant status of laying hens. S Afr J Anim Sci 48(2):390-399.

7.

Bailey A, Meyer L, Pettingell N, Macie M, Korstad J 2020 Agricultural practices contributing to aquatic dead zones. Pages 373-393 In: Ecological and Practical Applications for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer Singapore, Singapore.

8.

Banaszkiewicz T 2011 Nutritional value of soybean meal. Soybean Nutr 12:1-20.

9.

Batal A, Dale N, Café M 2005 Nutrient composition of peanut meal. J Appl Poult Res 14(2):254-257.

10.

Bell DD, Weaver WD 2012 Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production. 5th Ed. Springer Science & Business Media, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.

11.

Bish CL, Beane W, Ruszler P, Cherry J 1985 Body weight influence on egg production. Poult Sci 64(12):2259-2262.

12.

Bozkurt M, Basmacioglu H, Ergül M 2004 Effect of dietary concentration meat and bone meal on broiler chickens performance. Int J Poult Sci 3(11):719-723.

13.

Bryden W, Li X, Ruhnke I, Zhang D, Shini S 2021 Nutrition, feeding and laying hen welfare. Anim Prod Sci 61(10):893-914.

14.

Bunchasak C, Poosuwan K, Nukraew R, Markvichitr K, Choothesa A 2005 Effect of dietary protein on egg production and immunity responses of laying hens during peak production period. Int J Poult Sci 4(9):701-708.

15.

Casey KD, Bicudo JR, Schmidt DR, Singh A, Gay SW, Gates RS, Jacobson LD, Hoff SJ 2006 Air quality and emissions from livestock and poultry production/waste management systems. Page 40 In: Animal Agriculture and the Environment: National Center for Manure and Waste Management White Papers. Rice JM, Caldwell DF, Humenik FJ Eds. St. Joseph, MI.

16.

Chalova V, Kim J, Patterson P, Ricke S, Kim W 2016 Reduction of nitrogen excretion and emissions from poultry: a review for conventional poultry. J World’s Poult Sci 72(3):509-520.

17.

Chwalibog A 1985 Studies on energy metabolism in laying hens. Ph. D. Dissertation, Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, København, Denmark. Page 139.

18.

Costa E, Miller B, Pesti G, Bakalli R, Ewing H 2001 Studies on feeding peanut meal as a protein source for broiler chickens. Poult Sci 80(3):306-313.

19.

Da Nóbrega IPT, Reis MdP, Morillo FAH, De Freitas LFV-B, Bittencourt LC, Fernandes JBK, Sakomura NK 2022 Dynamics of growth and egg traits in three dietary balanced protein scenarios applied for laying hens. Animals 12(11):1371.

20.

Debaba GH, Li K, Wang X, Wang Y, Bai W, Li G 2024 Effect of nitrogen application rate on the relationships between multidimensional plant diversity and ecosystem production in a temperate steppe. Biology 13(8):554.

21.

Debnath BC, Biswas P, Roy B 2019 The effects of supplemental threonine on performance, carcass characteristics, immune response and gut health of broilers in subtropics during pre-starter and starter period. J Anim Physiol and Anim Nutr 103(1):29-40.

22.

Di D, He S, Zhang R, Gao K, Qiu M, Li X, Shi J 2024 Exploring the dual role of anti-nutritional factors in soybeans: a comprehensive analysis of health risks and benefits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (in press).

23.

Dolz S, De Blas C 1992 Metabolizable energy of meat and bone meal from Spanish rendering plants as influenced by level of substitution and method of determination. Poult Sci 71(2):316-322.

24.

Donkoh A, Anang D, Atuahene C, Koomson B, Oppong H 2001 Further studies on the use of solar-dried blood meal as a feed ingredient for poultry. J Anim Feed Sci 10(1):159-168.

25.

Dourado LRB, Pascoal LAF, Sakomura NK, Costa FGP, Biagiotti D 2011 Soybeans (Glycine max) and soybean products in poultry and swine nutrition. Pages 175-190 In: Recent Trends for Enhancing the Diversity and Quality of Soybean Products. London, UK.

26.

Du X, Wang Y, Amevor FK, Ning Z, Deng X, Wu Y, Wei S, Cao X, Xu D, Tian Y 2024 Effect of high energy low protein diet on lipid metabolism and inflammation in the liver and abdominal adipose tissue of laying hens. Animals 14(8):1199.

27.

Eagleson C, Clark T, Hill B, Daniels B, Eagleson A, Goodwin Jr H, Watkins S 2018 Impact of meat and bone meal nutritional variability on broiler performance. J Appl Poult Res 27(2):172-179.

28.

Elahi U, Xu CC, Wang J, Lin J, Wu SG, Zhang HJ, Qi GH 2022 Insect meal as a feed ingredient for poultry. Anim Biosci 35(2):332.

29.

Elnesr SS, Mahmoud BY, da Silva Pires PG, Moraes P, Elwan HA, El-Shall NA, Alagawany M 2024 Trace minerals in laying hen diets and their effects on egg quality. Biol Trace Elem Res 202(12):5664-5679.

30.

Elwinger K, Fisher C, Jeroch H, Sauveur B, Tiller H, Whitehead C 2016 A brief history of poultry nutrition over the last hundred years. World’s Poult Sci J 72(4):701-720.

31.

Esonu B, Izukanne R, Inyang O 2005 Evaluation of cellulolytic enzyme supplementation on production indices and nutrient utilization of laying hens fed soybean hull based diets. Int J Poult Sci 4(4):213-216.

32.

Fanatico A, Arsi K, Upadhyaya I, Ramos JM, Donoghue D, Donoghue A 2018 Sustainable fish and invertebrate meals for methionine and protein feeds in organic poultry production. J Appl Poult Res 27(4):437-448.

33.

FAO 2024 World Food and Agriculture: Statistical Yearbook 2024. Pages 159-165. FAO, Rome, Italy.

34.

Forbes J, Shariatmadari F 1994 Diet selection for protein by poultry. World’s Poult Sci J 50(1):7-24.

35.

Ghasemi HA, Hajkhodadadi I, Hafizi M, Taherpour K, Nazaran MH 2020 Effect of advanced chelate technology based trace minerals on growth performance, mineral digestibility, tibia characteristics, and antioxidant status in broiler chickens. Nutr Metab 17:1-12.

36.

Giannakis E, Kushta J, Bruggeman A, Lelieveld J 2019 Costs and benefits of agricultural ammonia emission abatement options for compliance with European air quality regulations. Environ Sci Eur 31(1):1-13.

37.

Gunawardana P, Roland Sr D, Bryant M 2008 Effect of energy and protein on performance, egg components, egg solids, egg quality, and profits in molted Hy-Line W-36 hens. J Appl Poult Res 17(4):432-439.

38.

Habib HN, Karomy AS, Kasim SA 2019 Influence of different levels of crude protein and metabolizable energy on production performance of Ross broiler. J Biol Agric Healthc 9(18):20-24.

39.

Han GP, Kim JH, Lee JH, Kim HW, Kil DY 2023 Research Note: effect of increasing fat supplementation in diets on productive performance, egg quality, and fatty liver incidence in laying hens throughout the entire laying cycle. Poult Sci 102(11):103069.

40.

Hasan R, Sarker S, Islam M, Sikder M, Rahman M 2018 Efficacy of spirulina on production indices of advanced age layer chicken. Ann. Bangladesh Agric 22:67-76.

41.

He S, Arowolo M, Medrano R, Li S, Yu Q, Chen J, He J 2018 Impact of heat stress and nutritional interventions on poultry production. World’s Poult Sci J 74(4):647-664.

42.

Hombegowda GP, Suresh BN, Shivakumar MC, Ravikumar P, Girish BC, Rudrappa SM, Indresh HC 2021 Growth performance, carcass traits and gut health of broiler chickens fed diets incorporated with single cell protein. Anim Biosci 34(12):1951.

43.

Hossaninejad SA, Zarghi H, Golian A 2021 Effect of digestible threonine on performance, egg quality, blood metabolites, and immune responses in laying hens fed a wheat-based diet in the second cycle. Ital J Anim Sci 20(1):2134-2146.

44.

Hu H, Huang Y, Li A, Mi Q, Wang K, Chen L, Zhao Z, Zhang Q, Bai X, Pan H 2024 Effects of different energy levels in low-protein diet on liver lipid metabolism in the late-phase laying hens through the gut-liver axis. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 15(1):98.

45.

Hurwitz S, Bornstein S 1973 The protein and amino acid requirements of laying hens: suggested models for calculation. Poult Sci 52(3):1124-1134.

46.

Hy-Line 2024 Hy-Line Brown Management Guide. Hy-Line International, Iowa.

47.

Jahan AA, Dao TH, Morgan NK, Crowley TM, Moss AF 2024 Effects of AM/PM diets on laying performance, egg quality, and nutrient utilisation in free-range laying hens. Appl Sci 14(5):2163.

48.

Jalasutram V, Kataram S, Gandu B, Anupoju GR 2013 Single cell protein production from digested and undigested poultry litter by Candida utilis: optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(2):265-273.

49.

Jeroch H 2011 Recommendations for energy and nutrients of layers: a critical review. Lohmann-Inf 46(2):61-72.

50.

Ji F, Fu S, Ren B, Wu S, Zhang H, Yue H, Gao J, Helmbrecht A, Qi G 2014 Evaluation of amino-acid supplemented diets varying in protein levels for laying hens. J Appl Poult Res 23(3):384-392.

51.

Kakhki RAM, Golian A, Zarghi H 2016 Effect of dietary digestible lysine concentration on performance, egg quality, and blood metabolites in laying hens. J Appl Poult Res 25(4):506-517.

52.

Karimi A 2006 The effects of varying fishmeal inclusion levels (%) on performance of broiler chicks. Int J Poult Sci 5(3):255-258.

53.

Keshavarz K, Austic R 2004 The use of low-protein, low-phosphorus, amino acid-and phytase-supplemented diets on laying hen performance and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion. Poult Sci 83(1):75-83.

54.

Khawaja T, Khan SH, Ansari NN 2007 Effect of different levels of blood meal on broiler performance during two phases of growth. Int J Poult Sci 6(12):860-865.

55.

Kidd M, Maynard C, Mullenix G 2021 Progress of amino acid nutrition for diet protein reduction in poultry. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 12:1-9.

56.

Kim E, Wickramasuriya SS, Shin TK, Cho HM, Kim HB, Heo JM 2020 Estimating total lysine requirement for optimised egg production of broiler breeder hens during the early-laying period. J Anim Sci Technol 62(4):521.

57.

Kim CH, Kang HK 2022 Effects of energy and protein levels on laying performance, egg quality, blood parameters, blood biochemistry, and apparent total tract digestibility on laying hens in an aviary system. Animals 12(24):3513.

58.

Kleyn FJ, Ciacciariello M 2023 An evaluation of the protein and energy requirements in long-life laying hens. J Appl Poult Res 32(1):100319.

59.

Kowalska E, Kucharska-Gaca J, Kuźniacka J, Lewko L, Gornowicz E, Biesek J, Adamski M 2021 Egg quality depending on the diet with different sources of protein and age of the hens. Sci Rep 11(1):2638.

60.

Leeson S 1989 Energy intake and layer performance. Pages 72-79 In: Proc. Califonia Nutr. Conf., California Grain and Feed Association, Fresno, CA.

61.

Liu L, Zhang G, Qu G, Liu B, Zhang X, Li G, Jin N, Li C, Bai J, Zhao C 2023 Effects of dietary Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG supplementation on the production performance, egg quality, eggshell ultrastructure, and lipid metabolism of late-phase laying hens. BMC Vet Res 19(1):150.

62.

Ma M, Geng S, Liu M, Zhao L, Zhang J, Huang S, Ma Q 2021 Effects of different methionine levels in low protein diets on production performance, reproductive system, metabolism, and gut microbiota in laying hens. Front Nutr 8:739676.

63.

Macelline SP, Toghyani M, Chrystal PV, Selle PH, Liu SY 2021 Amino acid requirements for laying hens: a comprehensive review. Poult Sci 100(5):101036.

64.

Madacussengua O, Mendes AR, Martins CF, Carvalho D, Almeida AMd, Lordelo M 2024 The effects of replacing soybean meal with chlorella vulgaris in laying hen diets on performance and physical characteristics of eggs. Animals 14(17):2552.

65.

Maia RC, de Sousa Ferreira R, Albino LFT, Calderano AA, Faria BD, da Silva DL, de França TP, Rostagno HS 2024 Effect of dietary non-essential amino acid sources on performance, nitrogen utilization and blood parameters for broiler chickens fed a low-protein diet. Anim Feed Scie Technol 315:116010.

66.

Miles RD, Jacob JP 1999. Fishmeal: Understanding Why This Feed Ingredient is So Valuable in Poultry Diets. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and drug. Pages 204-302.

67.

Mine Y 2008 Egg Bioscience and Biotechnology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

68.

Nagalakshmi D, Rao SVR, Panda AK, Sastry VR 2007 Cottonseed meal in poultry diets: a review. J Poult Sci 44(2):119-134.

69.

NRC 1994 Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Pages 1-34.

70.

Odunsi A 2003 Blend of bovine blood and rumen digesta as a replacement for fishmeal and groundnut cake in layer diets. Int J Poult Sci 2(1):58-61.

71.

Oke O, Akosile O, Oni A, Opowoye I, Ishola C, Adebiyi J, Odeyemi A, Adjei-Mensah B, Uyanga V, Abioja M 2024 Oxidative stress in poultry production. Poult Sci 103(9):104003.

72.

Oladokun V, Johnson A 2012 Feed formulation problem in Nigerian poultry farms: a mathematical programming approach. Amer J Sci Indust Res 3(1):14-20.

73.

Onimisi P, Orunmuyi M, Musa A, Bale S, Bawa G 2012 Effects of feed lysine content on laying performance and egg quality of late laying hens. Int J Appl Res Technol 1(1):104-110.

74.

Onwudike O 1981 Effect of various protein sources on egg production in a tropical environment. Trop Anim Health Prod 6(3):249-256.

75.

Panaite TD, Cornescu GM, Predescu NC, Cismileanu A, Turcu RP, Saracila M, Soica C 2023 Microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris and Spirulina platensis) as a protein alternative and their effects on productive performances, blood parameters, protein digestibility, and nutritional value of laying hens’ egg. Appl Sci 13(18):10451.

76.

Panda AK, Rama Rao SV, Raju MVLN, Niranjan M, Reddy MR 2012 Effect of nutrient density on production performance, egg quality and humoral immune response of brown laying (dahlem red) hens in the tropics. Trop Anim Health Prod 44(2):293-299.

77.

Parsons C, Castanon F, Han Y 1997 Protein and amino acid quality of meat and bone meal. Poult Sci 76(2):361-368.

78.

Patterson P, Acar N, Ferguson A, Trimble L, Sciubba H, Koutsos E 2021 The impact of dietary Black Soldier Fly larvae oil and meal on laying hen performance and egg quality. Poult Sci 100(8):101272.

79.

Patthawaro S, Saejung C 2019 Production of single cell protein from manure as animal feed by using photosynthetic bacteria. Microbiol 8(12):e913.

80.

Pesti G 1991 Response surface approach to studying the protein and energy requirements of laying hens. Poult Sci 70(1):103-114.

81.

Pesti G 2009 Impact of dietary amino acid and crude protein levels in broiler feeds on biological performance. J Appl Poult Res 18(3):477-486.

82.

Pitois S, Jackson MH, Wood BJ 2001 Sources of the eutrophication problems associated with toxic algae: an overview. J Environ Health 64(5):25-32.

83.

Prochaska JF, Carey J, Shafer D 1996 The effect of L-lysine intake on egg component yield and composition in laying hens. Poult Sci 75(10):1268-1277.

84.

Qaid MM, Al-Garadi MA 2021 Protein and amino acid metabolism in poultry during and after heat stress: a review. Animals 11(4):1167.

85.

Rao SR, Raju M, Panda A, Reddy M 2006 Sunflower seed meal as a substitute for soybean meal in commercial broiler chicken diets. Br Poult Sci 47(5):592-598.

86.

Rayne N, Aula L 2020 Livestock manure and the impacts on soil health: a review. Soil Syst 4(4):64.

87.

Raziq A, Lateef M, Ullah A, Ullah H, Khan W 2020 Single cell protein (SCP) production and potential substrates: a comprehensive review. Pure Appl Biol 9(3):1743-1754.

88.

Ritala A, Häkkinen ST, Toivari M, Wiebe MG 2017 Single cell protein—state-of-the-art, industrial landscape and patents 2001-2016. Front Microbiol 8:2009.

89.

Rozenboim I, Mahato J, Cohen N, Tirosh O 2016 Low protein and high-energy diet: a possible natural cause of fatty liver hemorrhagic syndrome in caged White Leghorn laying hens. Poult Sci 95(3):612-621.

90.

Sajid QUA, Asghar MU, Tariq H, Wilk M, Płatek A 2023 Insect meal as an alternative to protein concentrates in poultry nutrition with future perspectives (an updated review). Agriculture 13(6):1239.

91.

Sakomura NK, Reis MDP, Ferreira NT, Gous RM 2019 Modeling egg production as a means of optimizing dietary nutrient contents for laying hens. Anim Front 9(2):45-51.

92.

Salahuddin M, Abdel-Wareth AA, Stamps KG, Gray CD, Aviña AM, Fulzele S, Lohakare J 2024 Enhancing laying hens’ performance, egg quality, shelf life during storage, and blood biochemistry with Spirulina platensis Supplementation. Vet Sci 11(8):383.

93.

Saleh AA, El-Awady A, Amber K, Eid YZ, Alzawqari MH, Selim S, Soliman MM, Shukry M 2021 Effects of sunflower meal supplementation as a complementary protein source in the laying hen’s diet on productive performance, egg quality, and nutrient digestibility. Sustainability 13(6):3557.

94.

Sarsour AH, Lee J, Haydon K, Persia ME 2021 Tryptophan requirement of first-cycle commercial laying hens in peak egg production. Poultry Science 100(3):100896.

95.

Sedgh Gooya S, Torki M, Darbemamieh M, Khamisabadi H, Karimi Torshizi MA, Abdolmohamadi A 2021 Yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor (Col: Tenebrionidae), larvae powder as dietary protein sources for broiler chickens: effects on growth performance, carcass traits, selected intestinal microbiota and blood parameters. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 105(1):119-128

96.

Sell JL, Jeffrey MJ 1996 Availability for poults of phosphorus from meat and bone meals of different particle sizes. Poult Sci 75(2):232-239.

97.

Sellers R 2002 Opportunities and challenges of fish meal and fish oil in animal food. Pages 153-158 In: Advances in Seafood Byproducts. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seafood Byproduct Conference, November 10-13, 2002, University of Alaska Fairbanks., Anchorage, Alaska.

98.

Senkoylu N, Dale N 1999 Sunflower meal in poultry diets: a review1. World’s Poult Sci J 55(2):153-174.

99.

Shah AA, Wanapat M 2021 Gryllus testaceus walker (crickets) farming management, chemical composition, nutritive profile, and their effect on animal digestibility. Entomol Res 51(12):639-649.

100.

Shim M, Song E, Billard L, Aggrey S, Pesti G, Sodsee P 2013 Effects of balanced dietary protein levels on egg production and egg quality parameters of individual commercial layers. Poult Sci 92(10):2687-2696.

101.

Silva E, Malheiros E, Sakomura N, Venturini K, Hauschild L, Dorigam J, Fernandes J 2015 Lysine requirements of laying hens. Livest Sci 173:69-77.

102.

Slimen B, Yerou I, Larbi HB, M’Hamdi M, Najar N, Taha 2023 Insects as an alternative protein source for poultry nutrition: a review. Front Vet Sci 10:1200031.

103.

Srilatha T, Reddy VR, Preetam VC, Rao S, Reddy YR 2018 Effect of different levels of dietary crude protein on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of commercial broilers at different phases of growth. Indian J Anim Res 52(4):559-563.

104.

Stastnik O, Novotny J, Roztocilova A, Kouril P, Kumbar V, Cernik J, Kalhotka L, Pavlata L, Lacina L, Mrkvicova E 2021 Safety of mealworm meal in layer diets and their influence on gut morphology. Animals 11(5):1439.

105.

Stefanello C, Santos T, Murakami A, Martins E, Carneiro T 2014 Productive performance, eggshell quality, and eggshell ultrastructure of laying hens fed diets supplemented with organic trace minerals. Poult Sci 93(1):104-113.

106.

Stern RA, Mozdziak PE 2019 Differential ammonia metabolism and toxicity between avian and mammalian species, and effect of ammonia on skeletal muscle: a comparative review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 103(3):774-785.

107.

Such N, Pál L, Strifler P, Horváth B, Koltay IA, Rawash MA, Farkas V, Mezőlaki Á, Wágner L, Dublecz K 2021 Effect of feeding low protein diets on the production traits and the nitrogen composition of excreta of broiler chickens. Agriculture 11(8):781.

108.

Summers JD, Leeson S 1994 Laying hen performance as influenced by protein intake to sixteen weeks of age and body weight at point of lay. Poult Sci 73(4):495-501.

109.

Sun M, Ma N, Liu H, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhao J, Wang X, Li H, Ma B, Jiao H 2022 The optimal dietary arginine level of laying hens fed with low-protein diets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 13(1):63.

110.

Tamm CO 2012 Consequences of increased nitrogen supply to forests and other natural and seminatural terrestrial ecosystems. Pages 75-80 In: Nitrogen in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Questions of Productivity, Vegetational Changes, and Ecosystem Stability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.

111.

Thayer RH, Hubbell G, Kasbohm J, Morrison R, Nelson E 1974 Daily protein intake requirement of laying hens. Poult Sci 53(1):354-364.

112.

Toomer OT, Oviedo-Rondón EO, Ali M, Joseph M, Vu T, Fallen B, Mian R 2024 Full-fat soybean meals as an alternative poultry feed ingredient—feed processing methods and utilization: review and perspective. Animals 14(16):2366.

113.

Torki M, Mohebbifar A, Ghasemi HA, Zardast A 2015 Response of laying hens to feeding low-protein amino acid-supplemented diets under high ambient temperature: performance, egg quality, leukocyte profile, blood lipids, and excreta pH. Int J Biometeorol 59:575-584.

114.

Tyus J, Nahashon SN, Adefope N, Wright D 2009 Production performance of single comb white leghorn chickens fed growing diets containing blood meal and supplemental isoleucine. J Poult Sci 46(4):313-321.

115.

Vieira S, Stefanello C, Cemin H 2016 Lowering the dietary protein levels by the use of synthetic amino acids and the use of a mono component protease. Anim Feed Sci Technol 221:262-266.

116.

Wang L, Li A, Shi J, Liu K, Cheng J, Song D, Yan X, Wang Y, Wang W 2020 Effects of different levels of cottonseed meal on laying performance, egg quality, intestinal immunity and hepatic histopathology in laying hens. Food Agric Immunol 31(1):803-812.

117.

Ward MH, Jones RR, Brender JD, De Kok TM, Weyer PJ, Nolan BT, Villanueva CM, Van Breda SG 2018 Drinking water nitrate and human health: an updated review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(7):1557.

118.

Wright PA 1995 Nitrogen excretion: three end products, many physiological roles. J Exp Biol 198(2):273-281.

119.

Wythe L, Dittoe D, Ricke SC 2023 Advancements in poultry nutrition and genetics, the role of antibiotic growth promoters, and the introduction of feed additive alternatives. Pages 59-79 In: Direct-Fed Microbials and Prebiotics for Animals: Science and Mechanisms of Action. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.

120.

Xia W, Abouelezz K, Makled M, Wang S, Chen W, Zhang Y, Elokil A, Wang S, Huang X, Li K 2022 Effects of dietary substitution of peanut meal for soybean meal on egg production, egg quality, oxidative status, and yolk fatty acid profile in laying ducks. animal 16(11):100652.

121.

Yuan C, Bu X, Yan H, Lu J, Zou X 2016 Dietary L-arginine levels affect the liver protein turnover and alter the expression of genes related to protein synthesis and proteolysis of laying hens. Poult Sci 95(2):261-267.